Wednesday, March 18, 2020
The effects of the evolution of the tennis racquet Essay Example
The effects of the evolution of the tennis racquet Essay Example The effects of the evolution of the tennis racquet Paper The effects of the evolution of the tennis racquet Paper The game has changed dramatically over the last 30 years with the advancement of racquets being the major factor, of which most of the tactical techniques are finally being based around. This is because the racquet technology is increasing the power at which players can hit the ball which is changing the game in terms of technique hugely. This has in particular helped the service dominate matches, often leading to very little break of serve; simply because the services can be so powerful that its near impossible for a player to return them at all/with any accuracy. The power at which the ball can now be hit is the major factor in terms of tactical changes by players and coaches in tennis, as in the 1980s players were struggling to reach 110mph yet with the modernization of the tennis racquet players are aiming to serve at 130-150 mph; which is obviously a dramatic increase and will obviously have to play a part in the tactics of the game. A big change which has been noticed as new players have been coming through to be successful are the lack of serve volleyers, in particularly on the grass court. The only real successful player using the serve volley at the last Wimbledon was Tin Henman. This is because the players can hit the ball so hard from the baseline and get convincing and aesthetically pleasing winners that they dont need to serve and volley; then players who do try and use the serve volley tactics can easily be beaten by powerful shots from the baseline players. In particularly recently you can see the base line players coming out on top in all the tournaments and the over all rankings. For example in the rankings at the moment we can only really see one player ranking inside the top 10 that uses the serve volley tactic effectively; which is A. Agassi, although in comparison to players such as Tin Henman he uses the tactic rarely. The baseline players such as Federer, Safin, Ferrero and Roddick are dominating the tennis scene at the moment with their powerful services and powerful base line shots. Many people today argue that the evolution of the tennis racquet has gone too far and has made the sport too easy to win in very shot rallies and thus making it very boring in terms of a spectator sport. This is because the players can generate so much power and speed due too the advanced size, shape and materials of the racquet design that its now much easier for players to get aces or play shots which will easily pass the opponent. The introduction of rollers also benefits players massively as they work by distributing the force of the ball throughout the string bed rather than just he direct strings which had been struck by the ball; almost making the string bed act like one large string striking the ball rather than a bed of them. The string bed compresses much farther when the ball strikes it, this is said to make the string bed livelier; this not only increases the power of the shot but also reduces the effort of the shot and also the shock of this shot. The players have to keep up with the technology of the new racquets else they will be left at a distinct disadvantage to players who are utilising the technological advances. Although many people argue that some rules and regulations should be laid down to stop any further development of the tennis racquet as they argue that the game is becoming to boring to watch as the rallies are usually over in a 1, 2 or 3 shots. While this may be down to player skill its more likely that it is down to the development of the tennis racquet as in the 1980s and 1990s the average shots per rally were much higher than they are nowadays. To make the mens game in particular more exciting to the viewing public measures should be taken in order to reduce the power at which the ball can be hit; this will reduce the big servers advantage and make serve returns easier and thus making the rallies average length increase again. This could be done by putting limitations on the racquets which would cause a lot of complications and would be hard to standardise the racquets to meet each players need but still make them less powerful. Another much easier way of effectively slowing the game down and making it more aesthetically pleasing would be to change the type of balls used; as this would be simple to test and put into use in comparison to trying to change all the racquets which would cost much more money and cause a lot more hassle for tennis players and governing bodies. For example they could make the balls more absorbent and so absorbing some of the power from the racquet and making it travel slower and bounce less. Bibliography http://news.bbc.co.uk/.
Sunday, March 1, 2020
French Exclamative Adverbs - Adverbes dexclamation
French Exclamative Adverbs - Adverbes dexclamation Exclamative adverbs are placed in front of clauses to indicate shock, disbelief, awe, or some other strong emotion felt by the speaker. There are five French exclamative adverbs: commequequest-ce quece quecombien Comme means how, though many English speakers are likely reword the sentence to use so instead:   Comme il fait beau !   How nice the weather is! The weather is so nice!   Comme cest difficile !    How difficult it is! Its so difficult!   Comme tu es grand !   How tall you are! Youre so tall!Que is more or less interchangeable with comme:   Quil fait beau !   How beautiful the weather is!   Que cest difficile !   How difficult it is!   Que tu es grand !   How tall you are!Que de is used in front of nouns to stress so much or so many of something:   Que dargent !   So much money!   Que de monde !   So many people!   Que de difficultà ©s !   So many problems!Que followed by a subjunctive clause creates an indirect command.Informally, quest-ce que and ce que can replace comme and que:   Ques t-ce quil fait beau ! Ce quil fait beau !   The weather is so beautiful!   Quest-ce que cest difficile ! Ce que cest difficile !   Its so difficult!   Quest-ce que tu es grand ! Ce que tu es grand !    Youre so tall!Combien means how much or how many and must be followed by an adverb or by de noun:   Combien plus dà ©nergie que jai ! Combien plus dà ©nergie ai-je !    How much more energy I have! (I have so much more energy)   Combien dargent que tu dà ©penses ! Combien dargent dà ©penses-tu !   How much money youre spending! (Youre spending so much money!Note: The clause that follows the modified noun requires either inversion or que.Combien means how much/many or so much/many and may be followed by a clause, an adverb, or de noun:   Combien il a changà ©Ã‚ !    How he has changed! (Hes changed so much!)   Combien en a-t-on vus !   How many we saw! (We saw so many!)   Combien de fois ne lui a-t-on pas rà ©pà ©tà ©Ã‚ !   How many times have we told him!   Mais combien plus noble si les hommes mouraient pour des idà ©es vraies !      (Henri Louis Mencken, Extrait de Prà ©jugà ©s)   But how much more noble if men died for real ideas!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)